Every product leader used to brag about how quickly they could ship their product. However, with the rise of new regulations, today’s top PMs brag about their ability to ship fast while also showing their work, dataset lineage, bias tests, and audit hooks before any code reaches production.
The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) made that shift explicit when it set tier-based obligations that begin phasing in from February 2025 through August 2027.
Similar waves are now rolling across the United States, China, and Canada. What might look like red tape at first glance is actually a new competitive arena: customers and regulators now reward the teams whose governance is as intentional as their growth loops.
To that end, this piece helps you turn changes in regulation into actionable product strategy. You’ll learn why regulation is suddenly a product-side concern, decode the EU AI Act in plain roadmap language, turn legal risk into design actions, and show how disciplined compliance compounds into market advantage.
Regulators tend to intervene when technology reshapes human outcomes at scale. Foundation models that write essays, screen loan applicants, or draft radiology notes push legislators to answer society’s “why” and “how” questions. Three macro signals matter for you as a PM:
The EU AI Act bans certain “unacceptable-risk” systems outright (e.g., social scoring), imposes CE-style conformity assessments on “high-risk” categories, and demands user disclosures for “limited-risk” tools. Its extraterritorial reach means a SaaS startup in Austin still faces audits if a single EU customer touches the model.
Deadlines run from February 2025 (prohibitions and literacy rules) through to August 2027.
On 9 May 2025 the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) released modified draft regulations covering automated decision-making technology (ADMT). Public comment closed June 2; final text could drop by year-end, adding pre-deployment risk-assessment duties for any system that “makes or facilitates significant decisions about a consumer.”
Governor Newsom has already warned that early drafts may carry a $3.5 billion first-year cost if left unchecked, signaling the stakes for builders in the world’s fifth-largest economy.
China’s interim measures on generative AI require output labeling and security reviews, with an additional synthetic-content watermarking rule landing September 2025. Canada’s stalled Bill C-27 has prompted provincial regulators to publish their own AI bulletins, fragmenting requirements but raising the baseline expectation that models explain themselves.
At the end of the day, compliance is no longer a legal afterthought — it’s a first-class product constraint and, when handled correctly, a key differentiator.
Rather than trying to memorize 113 different legal articles, consider treating the EU AI Act as a prioritization framework that tells you where your governance must live in the backlog and when it must ship. The following table outlines some common AI use cases you might encounter alongside their corresponding obligations and signal:
| Risk tier | Typical use case | Obligations (simplified) | PM signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unacceptable | Social scoring, manipulative play-toys, indiscriminate biometric scraping | Prohibited from 2 Feb 2025 | Delete the concept |
| High-risk | Hiring filters, credit scoring, remote ID checks | Risk-management system, quality data, technical docs, human oversight, CE mark | Make governance stories part of the epic definition |
| Limited-risk | Chatbots, image generators, deep-fake tools | Transparency, watermarking, basic opt-outs | UX copy, toggle flags, telemetry |
| Minimal-risk | Spam filters, AI in games | No AI-specific rules beyond existing law | Normal SDLC |
Below are the key regulation dates that you should be aware of:
Treat these dates like release trains: land your code freeze one quarter earlier to leave room for conformity assessments and external audits.
While it’s important to familiarize yourself with all the articles in the Act, these three are especially important for you as a product manager:
Statutes can feel abstract until you map them into your team rituals. To help with that, here’s a playbook that folds governance into your sprint cadence without stalling velocity.
Before getting started, create a pre-build canvas that covers your intended purpose, risk-tier hypothesis, affected rights, and impact metric. For example:
| Block | Guiding question | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Intended purpose | Which user problem does the model solve? | Crisp verb/object statement |
| Risk-tier hypothesis | Which EU ban applies? | Early legal sign-off |
| Affected rights | Whose fundamental rights are touched? | Map to GDPR/CPRA |
| Impact metric | What KPI measures safe performance? | e.g., equal error rate |
To integrate compliance into your sprints, try implementing the following items into your backlog:
Alongside your backlog, it’s also important to consider ways to build compliance into your engineering rituals:
In her recent Leader Spotlight interview, Asma Syeda, Director of Product at Zoom, says, “If you can’t explain it to your grandmother, you probably don’t understand it well enough to deploy it safely.”
That litmus test transforms algorithmic transparency from a philosophical ideal into a UI copy review or a one-pager in plain English. Syeda notes that skipping this step leads to expensive re-work: “Fixing ethical issues post-launch costs around 10 times more than addressing them from the start.”
Build the checklist early, and velocity follows rather than fades.
Finally, as a best practice, build out a metrics flywheel that provides your team and stakeholders with insight into the state of your AI compliance. You might track metrics like:
| Metric | What it tracks |
|---|---|
| Mean time to legal approval | Shows the health of docs and tooling |
| Audit-ready log coverage | Surfaces observability gaps |
| Fairness stability index | Detects drift on sensitive attributes |
| Incident recurrence | Measures resilience gains |
Track these like you would activation or retention; they help earn you stakeholder trust that frees future cycles.
Oftentimes, people frame regulation as a friction, however you can use it to your advantage by leveraging it for sales, brand trust, and platform portability. Examples of this include:
Industry voices agree. Digital-banking veteran Jyoti Menon captures this upside plainly: “Fraud prevention and information security are crucial. While that seems like a boring competitive advantage to some, it’s critical.”
Trust is rarely sexy on a roadmap slide, yet it unlocks adoption in regulated verticals faster than any growth hack.
The age of “launch now, lawyer later” has closed. The next era belongs to PMs who treat AI compliance as a fundamental development step, just as tangible as user journeys or conversion funnels.
Start every discovery effort with a risk-tier hypothesis. Wire algorithmic transparency into your copy deck. Ship bias tests in the same pull request as hyper-parameter changes.
And remember Syeda’s grandmother test: if your explanation fails a non-technical loved one, you still have work to do.
Regulations will evolve, but early governance compounds like any other product moat. Teams who internalize it will iterate faster, sleep better, and most importantly, earn the durable trust of users whose lives their models now touch.
Featured image source: IconScout
LogRocket identifies friction points in the user experience so you can make informed decisions about product and design changes that must happen to hit your goals.
With LogRocket, you can understand the scope of the issues affecting your product and prioritize the changes that need to be made. LogRocket simplifies workflows by allowing Engineering, Product, UX, and Design teams to work from the same data as you, eliminating any confusion about what needs to be done.
Get your teams on the same page — try LogRocket today.
Tyler Stone, Associate Director, Product at Sensor Tower, talks through how he’s led Sensor Tower through a complete product redesign.
AI agrees too easily. That’s a problem. Learn how to prompt it to challenge your thinking and improve your product decisions.
Chrissie Lamond, VP of Product at Mansueto Ventures, talks about how she builds product experiences across audience segments.
Rachel Bentley shares the importance of companies remaining transparent about reviews and where they’re sourced from to foster user trust.
Learn more →
